Friday, November 4, 2016

Can Color Be Avoided?

                Already in the first two chapters in The White Boy Shuffle, Beatty dives in and indirectly questions the universal problem asking if it is possible not to judge somebody based off of the color of their skin. Beatty uses the character of Ms. Cegeny—the main character’s third grade teacher--, and shows how she always pounds into the heads of kids should be judged for their “minds” and not their “color”. But through this process Beatty hints at how it is almost impossible in modern America to do so.
                The method which Beatty uses to show how racism is something hard to avoid, is by relating it to something that has embedded itself in the world, such as nature, human eyesight, and mental capabilities. For example, when Melissa –one of the students—reads an article in the class about sunlight, I believe that Beatty purposely left in the part where Melissa says “Dark colors such as black absorb sunlight and light colors such as white reflect sunlight”. He does this to show that even something as necessary and common in daily life as sunlight is not colorblind, but treats blacks differently than whites. Later on in the day the main character goes to the doctor’s office to get examined, and asks the doctor “Our teacher says that we should be colorblind. That’s hard when you can see color, isn’t it?”. Here Beatty is making a metaphor to race, where even though the teacher is asking the students to be colorblind it’s almost impossible when humans can see the color on people’s skin, and sometimes it’s hard not to treat others differently based off of the history that is behind the color of their skin and the stereotypes which come with that.
                In The White Boy Shuffle Ms. Cegeny is a perfect example of the naïve white, patriotic, American who although is under good intentions to try and forget America’s racist past, thinks that it can be forgotten in an instant, in this case by telling 3rd graders to do so. Like I said before, it is smart to try and change racism in America, but it cannot simply be told to children at a young age. Children should be informed of the racism in America first, so they can understand why it’s such a deep problem, and how much harder it is to change. In result they won’t just think of equality as something that is morally right like washing your hands, but something which is more of a sensitive issue, that might be solved in a couple centuries.

 In Beatty’s prologue, he takes on a pessimistic point of view and implies that it is such of a problem that it will never be solved. Beatty says, “In the quest for equality black folks have tried everything. We’ve begged, revolted, entertained, and intermarried and still are treated like shit. Nothing works, so why suffer the slow deaths of toxic addiction [] when the immediate gratification of suicide awaits [] our mass suicide will be the ultimate sit-in”. I wonder if similar to invisible man, this story will show a transformation illustrating how the main character changes from a fun-loving kid, being taught that everyone is equal regardless of their skin color, to the pessimistic man we see in the prologue who knows it is impossible to erase racism because he has experienced so much of it that it has become a permanent part of the world.

6 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think you give a good analysis of this specific part of the book. I liked the breakdown of the sunlight lesson, in that black people are treated differently than whites. I think it could also be taken as an analogy to white privilege, where different forms of racism directly affect black people, while prejudice (not racism) towards white people is simply "reflected" off, with no impact or consequences. I also liked your connection of this scene to the prologue. It shows Gunnar go from recognizing and acknowledging racism at an early age to a state of pure hopelessness.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah I agree, no matter what people try to believe Black people will be treated differently because of History, and you can see it even when the Ms. Cegeny says everyone is equal and color doesn't matter, even when throughout the book she pays special attention to Gunner (the only black kid) when talking about the topic.

      Delete
  3. 1) I definitely agree with the points you made here. Racism and oppression are so deeply/systemically engrained within our system that it's not possible to just uproot or ignore the differences that have been created racially, ethnically, as a result of past history. From an extremely young age, prejudices and biases are formed. As you said, we have to educate everyone on the history before we can fully address and shift ideals.
    2) I think that the structure of Invisible Man and The White Boy Shuffle are very similar. But I think that the narrator's voices are slightly different. Gunnar seems to question what he's taught and starts to reflect more deeply on his identity at an earlier age. Whereas, the narrator in Invisible Man more unquestioningly follows what he's told and keeps harmful ideas for a long time in his life. I am definitely anxious to see how Gunnar makes the shift to the pessimistic view that we see in the prologue though (more similar to the narrator in IM).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah Gunner definitely questions stereotypes and racism earlier, I think a lot of it has to do with being exposed to both sides of the spectrum going to a rich white school where people try to ignore it, and a school with more minorities where he learns that racism is still something they suffer.

      Delete
  4. I agree that it is important to target children to change the mindset of future generations. I feel it would have been most effective if a teacher who understood racism taught about the significance of race. Ms. Cenegy does not experience or understand how race effects the lives of others which is why it was easy for her to ignore it. Still, when children go home to their parents, their beliefs may be altered. Perhaps slightly older children may be a better option because they are old enough to stray from their parents beliefs yet young enough to be incredibly impressionable. I think it's interesting to compare Gunnar in his mostly white elementary school versus his high school. At that point, it seems he had already lost hope for white people. Or perhaps any hope he had left was lost after the two years was over.

    ReplyDelete